Womanhood Today - Voices of Womanhood , Voices in Focus: News & CommentaryWomanhood Today - Voices of Womanhood , Voices in Focus: News & Commentaryhttps://www.womanhood.today/voices/voices-in-focusMon, 08 Sep 2025 21:56:51 -0700http://zoho.com/sites/<![CDATA[Why Is Kamala Harris Not Leading in the Polls?]]>https://www.womanhood.today/voices/post/why-is-harris-not-leading-in-the-pollsWhy is Kamala Harris not leading in the 2024 election despite her qualifications? Explore the role of gender, race, and politics in this tight race.]]>

Introduction:

Tuesday’s debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump provided another glimpse into the complex dynamics of the 2024 presidential race. For many of us, Harris represents the very definition of qualified. With a background as the Attorney General of California, a U.S. Senator, and now Vice President, she has more government experience than any president we've seen in the 21st century, all of whom have been men. So, why is the race still so close?

Mainstream Media Analysis:

I have watched and read quite a bit of analysis from mainstream media channels. In particular, MSNBC, CNN, and NPR. NPR's analysis of the debate highlighted some of the major takeaways, including Harris’ calm, factual approach versus Trump’s more theatrical delivery of wild conspiracy theories. And yet, despite Harris' credentials and her ability to hold her own on stage, the polls don't reflect a significant lead.

Her Qualifications vs. His Cognitive Decline:

It’s puzzling, honestly. The fact that a woman of her caliber isn't the clear frontrunner raises some serious questions. Is it because she's a woman? Or perhaps because she's a Black and South Asian woman in a country still grappling with issues of sexism and racism? Her background should be a point of confidence for voters. This is a woman who knows how to govern. So, why isn’t her track record being enough to pull her ahead of a former president who is often caught up in outlandish claims and a questionable grasp on facts?


One can’t help but notice that Trump seems to skirt accountability when it comes to his constant peddling of conspiracy theories and signs of cognitive decline. Why is he not called out more? Why is there such a hesitation, even among his detractors, to hold him to the same standard of scrutiny that Harris faces? We know that women in leadership often face higher expectations and are judged more harshly. But this feels like something more.


Could it be that the electorate still isn’t ready to embrace a woman in the highest office, despite her qualifications? Or is it simply the polarization of the country, with voters so entrenched in their party affiliations that experience and competency no longer matter as much as political identity?


It’s a frustrating situation, especially when you consider that Harris, by all standards of experience, intellect, and capability, should be the one leading this race. If she were a man with this resume, would we even be asking these questions? Or would the conversation be entirely different?

Final Thoughts:

As we approach November, I find myself wondering whether her gender and race are the invisible barriers that keep her from securing a more decisive lead. It’s something we’ve seen before. Women leaders often have to work twice as hard to prove they belong in spaces traditionally dominated by men. Harris is proving herself over and over again, but is the country willing to see it?


Only time will tell whether the voters will acknowledge her extensive qualifications, experience, and confidence (Presidential demeanor) or continue to give a pass to her opponent.

]]>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:02:58 -0700<![CDATA[Challenging Sexist Narratives: Tucker Carlson’s Sexist Attack on Women in the Military is Outrageous and Wrong]]>https://www.womanhood.today/voices/post/military-vets-denounce-tucker-carlsonLearn how Tucker Carlson's sexist comments about women in the military show his ignorance.]]>

Introduction:

Once again, conservative commentator Tucker Carlson has shown his disdain for women in the most ridiculous and offensive way possible. In one of his infamous rants, Carlson belittled the efforts of the US military to improve uniforms for women in combat and upgrade combat armor to fit the female body. This move is a clear sign of progress, meant to ensure the safety and comfort of female soldiers, an effort that should be applauded. Instead, Carlson mocked these essential upgrades, revealing his utter lack of respect for women serving in our armed forces.

Equipping Our Service Members Equally:

Women in the Military
Women have been serving honorably and with distinction for centuries.
What Carlson fails to understand is that women serving in the military deserve the same respect and resources as their male counterparts. This isn’t about coddling or "wokeness". It’s about practicality and fairness. Women are a vital part of our military and should be given equipment that fits their bodies properly, just as men have been provided with for decades. A combat uniform or body armor designed for a man is not going to provide the same protection or comfort for a woman. Should female soldiers risk injury or death because Tucker Carlson thinks addressing that reality is "silly"?

I want to note that I have not served in the military. I deeply respect those who are able to, and I even tried to enlist after high school, but was told I couldn’t due to a chronic medical condition. My respect for service members, especially women who serve in a historically male-dominated institution, is unwavering. Tucker Carlson, who has never served either, clearly has no respect for the dedication, strength, or intelligence of women in the military. His flippant remarks ignore the very real challenges women face and undermine their contributions to our national defense.

This type of sexist and idiotic behavior from a commentator like Carlson isn’t just offensive; it’s dangerous. It perpetuates outdated stereotypes and emboldens those who believe that women don’t belong in the military. Women have been serving honorably and with distinction for centuries. They have fought and died for our country, and they deserve every bit of support and respect, including access to the gear and tools they need to do their jobs safely.

Final Thoughts:

It’s time to call out this toxic rhetoric for what it is: a reflection of deep-seated misogyny that refuses to acknowledge the progress women have made or the contributions they are making every day. Tucker Carlson’s mockery only serves to highlight his own ignorance, and we should not let his loud, misguided opinions drown out the real stories of women in uniform, who are fighting not only for their country but for the recognition they deserve.


Have you or someone you loved served in the military? First, thank you for your service! Second, please leave a comment below sharing your thoughts on this. I would also like to invite you to be a guest on our podcast. We would love to share your story. 

]]>Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:22:27 -0700